More facts points towards a MOON HOAX
Yes..the moon landing was real..they left me a burger anyway!
Personally I feel that it`s really sad that the moon landing hoax controversy is still evident after 36 years. On July 20th, 1969 they said our lives changed forever. Thats true, it was then we walked into the tunnel of LIES! Just stop for a moment and think about this: up to this date, only three countries have been able to put a man merely in Earth orbit, the United States, Russia, and China. That speaks for just how difficult it is just to get into orbit. Next, consider how far away the moon is from the Earth: 240,000 miles. Since the alleged moon landings, no country even claims to have gone more than 400 miles from Earth and that was in the Space Shuttle. The International Space Station orbits at 200 miles above Earth. There is a big difference between 240,000 miles and 400 miles. Why can’t anyone make it more than 400 miles from Earth today if we could make a 480,000 mile round trip in 1969? A mainstream answer to this is money. Putting astronauts on the moon is not economically nor scientifically feasible according to NASA. I say BS! The real reason is and have always been, that they can`t. Read below
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Cosmic rays are so dangerous and so poorly understood that people are unlikely to get to Mars or even “back” to the Moon until better ways are found to protect astronauts, experts said…Link
Scientist`s today also can not understand after watching and investigating the different material used for the so called Moon landing, how they EVER could have worked. And when these Scientists were asked to put together a Space craft with the same old material that were used back in 1969 with the same totally worthless computer power to calculate drift-off`s etc. The Apollo guidance computer had the equivalent computing power of today’s kitchen appliances, far less than that required to go to the Moon. Scientist`s of today came to the conclusion and STATED firmly that it wasn’t possible!
But NASA still asserts that three men were loaded into a rocket, flew 240,000 miles to the moon and then achieved lunar orbit. They say the spacecraft separated and two astronauts flew 60 miles to the surface of the moon, in a craft not even thicker in it`s shields than thin foil, at some spots, and all that in a vacuum with 1/6 Earth gravity. They then hung out on the moon for up to three days in 250 degree heat, hit golf balls, rode a moon buggy but what powered their life support and equipment? They say BATTERIES. Oh no way…… Because not even batteries of today’s date hold that high effectiveness. Remember a modern electric car can`t go more than 40 miles after a charge, so think about it! But according to NASA they then supposedly blasted off the surface of the moon, docked with the third man going around the moon at over 4000 miles per hour, and made it 240,000 miles back to Earth. They re-entered Earth’s atmosphere going 25,000 mph, but parachutes assured a safe landing in the ocean. Come on! just ask yourself ffs, Am I the only one wondering how a 10-foot Rover could to fit into the 5-foot side of the LM? Also ask yourself if Grumman who allegedly built the Lunar Module (LM), that unwieldy looking craft that never flew on Earth but supposedly landed safely on the moon six times. We should ask for blueprints detailing the scientific thought behind its function and design. Did it run by a computer? If so, who built the computer? What made Grumman engineers think it could fly? Was Grumman all of a sudden SUPER computer manufacturers? Mainstream numb-nuts and Dis-info agents always answer this following question with a standard answer, which I here like to pulverize.
I ask a question : The Apollo guidance computer had the equivalent computing power of today’s egg clock, and that`s far less than required to go to the Moon. How was this possible?
Dis-info answer : Unlike general-purpose computers, the Apollo guidance computer had to perform only one task, guidance. Most of the number crunching was performed at Mission Control on several mainframe computers. The results were then transmitted to the on-board computer, which acted upon them. The Apollo guidance computer was capable of computing only a small number of navigation problems itself. Since the guidance computer had to run only one program, that program could be put in ROM, thus only a small amount of RAM was required to hold the temporary results of guidance calculations. All you hoax advocates tend to overrate the tasks performed by the on-board guidance computers of the 1960′s. In fact, the Mercury spacecraft, 1961-63, flew into space without any on-board computer whatsoever, yet the trajectories were precisely controlled and the capsule was capable of fully automated control.
Well first of all, take a look at this statement “The results were then transmitted to the on-board computer” with what? we had NO high-speed capability like SCL, 3G or 4G so it would have been impossible to send that amount of data far out in space in 1969.
Second they state ” Mercury spacecraft, 1961-63, flew into space without any on-board computer whatsoever, yet the trajectories were precisely controlled and the capsule was capable of fully automated control” so if it flew into space sooo perfectly WHY put a computer on-board Apollo 11 then?
I’m a computer technician, and I can`t figure out how a TOY computer like the (AGC) on-board Apollo at that time, could even calculate when the astronauts was to wake up in the morning? Because the on-board Apollo Guidance Computer (AGC) was about 1 cubic foot with 2K of 16-bit RAM and 36K of hard-wired core-rope memory with copper wires threaded or not threaded through tiny magnetic cores. The 16-bit words were generally 14 bits of data (or two op-codes), 1 sign bit, and 1 parity bit. The cycle time was 11.7 micro-seconds. Programming was done in assembly language and in an interpretive language, in reverse Polish. The power of an egg clock that is! And on top of this huge cube of garbage a 10-foot Rover and some Astronauts? Nah! I don`t think so. Some of the latest news now, is that NASA have lost all the tapes from the moonwalk to? 36 years after the tapes went into storage, NASA was suddenly eager to have them. There was just one problem: The tapes were nowhere to be found. I believe after my research in this topic, that it was a political game for power and advantage over the East. THE MOON landing was nothing more than a propaganda Hoax.
Apollo Zero Video
Sources
http://www.fas.org/spp/military/docops/usaf/2020/app-f.htm
http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicapollo.html
http://www.theonion.com/articles/conspiracy-theorist-convinces-neil-armstrong-moon,2796/
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/moon.htm
Read the article I have written on the site of David Percy “Aulis on line” about the computer of Apollo:
http://www.aulis.com/pascal.htm
It shows the total nonsense it was.
And if you want more details, you can see what I say about it on my personal site:
http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/xpascal/MoonHoax/AGC/AGC.HTM
But the problem is not just about the computer; all the electronic interfaces without exception contain intentional errors as I show on my personal site:
http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/xpascal/MoonHoax/ApolloSystems/ApolloSystems.HTM
The engineers of the NASA played the whistle-blowers, they were obviously not appreciating what they were forced to do.
I am deeply disgusted by Apollo.
Simply JUST EXCELLENT! and thank you very much. Very iformative.
http://www.aulis.com/pascal.htm